Tom Ford. Mayor of Toronto. And crack user, cokehead, prostitute aficionado, and all around decent guy who has some demons in the public eye and can’t seem to get out of his own way. The press conferences alone have been worth the price of admission, and when he publicly denied offering to eat an aide’s pussy (verbatim), he truly became the next guy in line of politicians who have besmirched themselves while parading in public office. He even bowled over a lady, saying he was trying to get to his brother. So rather than provide any sort of commentary about the mayor who can’t get out of his own way, I’m just going to post a couple of videos of what happens when you roll on some Rob Ford. Before the videos, one quick comment on these wild ass politicians as of late – who the hell was their campaign coordinators? Those people deserve some raises, as these elected officials are out of pocket with their behavior as public servants so much so that it must have taken a fantastically designed campaign to pull the wool over the masses’ eyes. Seriously, mayors of cities are operating as though they won’t be caught up because they’re the mayor of a cosmopolitan, world-important city. It’s like everybody thinks they can get elected, do crazy shit, and then get re-elected on the strength of their moral principles. Tom Ford is wild as hell. Mayor of San Diego was out here fondling everybody in his office. What the world else is coming next?
My cousin said this to me once about his weed use and the likelihood of getting caught up in a situation:
“Dude, when they got Bill Clinton, the President of the United States, for getting some head in the oval office, that was when I knew that no matter what precautions I take, I’m still probably going to get caught.”
These mayors ain’t Bill Clinton. So if he could get caught up in the relatively low-tech age of the late 90’s, don’t you think it’s even more likely that you’ll get caught up in the tech age? Every email, text, tweet, Facebook message, phone call, blog post, interview, statement, question – everything you do gets recorded in the public domain as part of the public record but you honestly, truly, in your heart of hearts thought that the side chick would be quiet (with relatively little incentive for her to stay quiet)? You thought the drug use would be kept quiet? That’s highly IGNANT.
More importantly, I don’t really care about personal proclivities insofar as it’s your job to govern – if you want to cheat on your wife and run the city fairly, you can do that as they aren’t mutually exclusive. But being on crack/cocaine and running a city fairly does seem like a tall order. Crackheads aren’t known for their leadership skills, though they’re mighty adept at acquisition. They tend to lack a certain diplomacy, much like Dave Chappelle reminded us.
The best part of this? He refuses to step down, so the city council just took away certain mayoral powers he has. I’m not sure I would move to Toronto, the budget might get done in on a booze-filled, coke-fueled binge.
With all that said, if someone told me I could pop a Molly or be Rob Ford for a weekend, I’ll be Rob Ford (White privilege! Rejoice!)….on Molly.
 So in one sense, it’s not mutually exclusive – you can be a complete bastard towards your family and still be an effective leader of government. This, however, could be disputed if, as a woman (or person who has been cheated on), unfairness could be distributed through public condoning of infidelities and/or additional measures that ignore the positions that a victim of infidelity could have insofar as it relates to political processes or legal processes. It might be harder to trust a known infidel, but one could also argue that if the mistrust is due to whatever personal issues the infidel may have and not due to a prior governance record, then that mistrust has been misplaced.